@padzank Yeah had wished for the same. If only for the idea that it can improved our relationship with Binance and their community by promoting this trough social media. Was hoping to attract more BNB investors to our DEX with just one BNB pair.

https://swth.info/airdrop-log - here is the log with statuses and info, we can even see number of TradeHub wallets with ETH wallets activated now.

A bit late to the party, I would suggest that changes be incremental rather than a sweeping change. A sweeping change proposal could potentially backfire as: This is complex and affects a lot of people. Holders might not fully understand the impact until it hits. A sweeping change will also cause a lot of confusion about the old/new apys for various pools. Holders who are locked have no ability to unlock if it negatively impacts them. Therefore I suggest that the approach should be about proposals that change one thing at a time until we reach equilibrium or have nothing left to change. It's similar to the hill-climbing algorithm where we can reach a locally optimum point by simply making incremental decisions that are beneficial to us.

@Juanito - Hi, Unfortunately, the proposal claimed from the SDF the exact number of tokens required to fulfil the unswapped users claims, so there are no additional tokens to distribute. As we have told others, if you can rally others who haven't claimed the procedure can be repeated, so long as somebody is prepared to do the legwork to make it happen via a proposal etc.

I like the idea in its essence. Some open questions: How does it scale to > 23 validators? (e.g. How does this look like with 100 validators?) Ideally it should work nicely even if max validator num is voted to be larger or smaller by using scaled values, rather than using hard-coded numbers. In terms of implementation - what is needed? Has the cosmos-sdk codebase that is relevant to this (see x/distribution module) been looked at? Core devs only has time to do so after Stargate. If we have consensus on the idea, ideally the patch can be funded by SDF too.

Thank you. I will let the developers know

Hello everyone , As planned, we provide the community with various tools in order to track and actively participate in the development of the application: Feedback platform: https://seraph-staking.hellonext.co/b/feedback Tracking platform: https://trello.com/b/VNpTQ5i3 This proposal being focused on the rewrite of the application in React Native, this is what we are currently working on but nothing prevents you from starting to propose new features or improvements.

@acidbird I see - thanks!

@kang - All good points, we will need to put our money where our mouths are and seed liquidity, as you say, the raw maker fee rebate will not be enough initially to be an attraction. All of these listing should aim to build a habit in a growing number of traders in new communities to do it on TradeHub exchanges. Thanks for the initiative.

Hi All, 300k SWTH disbursement has been made from the Intsol Community Staking validator wallet escrow to the developers as requested. Transfer Transactions: https://switcheo.org/transaction/9A04F25B589C605AE93287A8FE507584D2A0D2CB4DEA7F2CDA7F1765D19C3461?net=main https://switcheo.org/transaction/4B17970A62B64CCB924061A9D2367084B2719D7726FAF32FEEEE9F0FC4291732?net=main Code, documentation and test coverage are of a high standard. Thanks to Switcheolytics and Devel484 for this collaboration and contribution to the community toolbox. Here's looking forward to seeing what can be built using it

@Devel484 I supported the proposal to create a token just so that if we need it in the future, it's already accessible. It's not a bad idea to create the token first. It might be good to have USDT/USDC pair tho

@redsparrow As DAOs are still at an early stage, I foresee a lot of trial and error as this space matures. Plutocracy is a recurring issue in voting though I think a well thought out reputation-based model with mechanisms that deter whales from colluding the system would be effective. For example, a mechanism to stop whales from swaying the vote at the last minute would be useful. So, I suppose the voting structure from the get-go has to be well thought out based on the type of platform, product etc

We are working on using the full liquidity of the LP in the next upgrade, right now only ~30 quotes are generated, which results in a thinner liquidity than expected due to the small tick sizes.

Bot trading is getting more popular every day, and for me, as a true, I thought that this type of service was really interesting to try. Yeah, I was pretty certain to get a lot of profit with one single click through this crypto bot and sit back and do nothing.

Yep. Becoming more decentralized on Switcheo, and fully decentralized on Demex, is the plan. Sorry it took me a while to get to the question

After the discussion on Discord we place this proposal on hold to maybe see what the Switcheo marketing prepared, we reached them out to get their view on this. We hope that we will start seeing Ethereum crowd onboarding Demex soon, for now we still have only 349 active Ethereum TradeHub wallets and none were created during the last 3 days =(. https://swth.info/airdrop-log/

Interesting. I think Switcheo will need several arms to communicate with the various blockchains teams that are entering Defi. As far as I know Cardano, Fantom, NEO and Zilliqa have already positioned themselves to enter the Defi space. Switcheo will need a large capacity to absorb this demand. Projects that need high confidence in code security, such as financial projects (Defi) should choose safer and more efficient blockchains, so I would keep my eyes wide open for Cardano and Tezos, as both use programming language programming language functional, which will be ideal for projects with little tolerance for bugs or hacks.

@menno-v "Kill your own product, before competition does". Competition is always looking at you, and right around the corner. Trying to get your part of the market. Sometimes with new features, sometimes with agressive marketing, sometimes law-suits (Boeing-Airbus). Looking at the Crypto-Industry I think most competition is from innovation (development) and new entrees to the market. I sometime wish there was a huge floorspace filled with Demex-dedicated Dev's, Marketing & Commuication employees, and Demex-Enterpreneurs, and so on to meet our needs before competition does. That's not possible, so we need to find an other way. And I think that is trough strategic collaborations. Getting others to join forces, bring their businesses to TradeHub, combine Dev-power. Anyone want to share his/her thoughts?

Another solution will be to set a cap on the maximum allowable % tokens (say 10%) that can be staked with a Validator. Once the ceiling is reached delegators will not be able to delegate to that particular Validator and naturally delegate to other lower cap Validators. Thus, Tradehub will balance itself and eliminate the campaign by anybody to encourage delegators to delegate to lower % cap Validators and eliminate centralization of the voting power.

@redsparrow The level of decentralization is an interesting question. MakerDAO makes a great case study for decentralization vs government regulation. Think it is hard to assess some risks if there has been no previous events to refer from. The lawsuit is an indicator that the crypto & blockchain space needs its own set of regulations in times where a decision could not be enforced by the community. Think the idea behind Switcheo Foundation is to have a DAO in the future.